« When the best part of your day are the dark chocolate M&Ms... | Main | Al Franken: He Sounds Taller on the Radio »
October 29, 2005
Interviewing
I guess I sorta let a cat out of a bag in my last post. And I discovered that a couple of my colleagues have found and read this blog - and the mention of interviewing caused them to ask me to explain...
Since moving to WA, I've gotten a steady trickle (to call it a stream would be over stating the fact) of contacts from head-hunters and recruiters. I'm a new data point in their search - someone in WA they hadn't seen before. (I keep my resume online, and while it's not current, it's pretty close.) Until October 11th (my 1 year anniversary of hire) I had a simple response - "I'm under a relocation agreement until the middle of October, so I'm not looking to leave my position, thanks."
A few days after the 11th I got one of these calls from a local company. They had been given my name by someone who I had worked with briefly and now worked for them. My patent excuse was half out of my mouth before my brain kicked in and I realized I wasn't under any such agreement.
So I agreed to a phone conversation with the hiring manager, which turned into several aborted attempts to get together for lunch and finally settling on meeting for a chat over drinks one evening after work.
The position wasn't terribly exciting, but talking to this fellow about the development process they had was sort of a breath of fresh air. We don't have a process at work, much - we just have thrash. Everyone (on the technical teams) seems to agree that it's bad, but momentum is a harsh mistress.
So that got me thinking...
Around the same time I got an email from a small software company responsible for a very well known and respected game and digital content distribution system. Their recruiter had found my resume, passed it to the hiring manager, and he wanted to speak with me.
Not one to turn down a conversation, we had a chat. That turned into a half-day visit to their offices in Bellevue. That position was much more interesting, but the lack of process sounded familiar.
I had been completely upfront with both parties about my current position and the complications involved with leaving. Specifically, there were two. First off, I'm good friends with the CTO, which means I can't really just vanish - I owe him at least a cogent explanation and some warning. Second, all this happened right about the time when it was being decided that I'd be taking direct management responsibility over a team. Vanishing at that particular moment would have put my direct manager in an awkward situation.
I committed to both interested parties to tell them where my head was after the coming weekend, and I started thinking hard.
Did I mention that all this was around the same time when Microsoft decided to hand us a suitcase of cash ? So suddenly all those options I had been given when I was hired had the potential to actually be worth something.
Nothing's ever simple, is it?
I ultimately decided to stay where I am for another 6 months and then think again. The six month number isn't magic - it corresponds to when the first chunk of my stock options vest.
The reasons for staying are more complicated than the stock.
Part of it is my respect for, and friendship with, my direct manager and the CTO. Part is my respect for many of the folks I work with, including the guys who now work for me. Part is wanting to see if I, in a management position, can change that lack of process and general organizational stupidity. Part is because of some imminent product launches at work - some really cool stuff that I've been involved with and is about to finally come to fruition. And part of it is that I, in part, justified the move by thinking about the job as a three year "thing."
It was a tough decision to make - I haven't been enjoying work much lately, and I've been pretty transparent to folks that this step into management isn't really what I want, I'm just doing it for "the good of the many" (assuming it turns out to be good for anybody.)
So I had a conversation with the two people at work who needed to know, and I basically explained that I had been interviewing and had decided to abort that process; and that I would take stock of the situation in the middle of next year and decide if the moratorium would be lifted.
Was it the right decision?
I'm not sure. But one of the things I learned a long time ago was that looking back isn't constructive. I made a decision, right or wrong, and now it's time to start discovering and dealing with the consequences of that decision.
Posted by dberger at October 29, 2005 4:58 PM
Comments
The real question is - has MS fitted you with your laser eye beams and mechanical arms yet? :)
And good on you for taking the noble road re: jobs and stuff. There aren't enough people like you out there, much to the discredit of our (loosely defined) field. :)
Posted by: Scott Snyder at October 30, 2005 8:59 AM